How does concrete’s carbon footprint compare to natural stone in sculpture production?

When comparing the carbon footprint of concrete and natural stone in sculpture production, several factors come into play. Concrete, a man-made material, has a significantly higher carbon footprint due to its energy-intensive manufacturing process, which involves cement production—a major source of CO2 emissions. In contrast, natural stone, such as marble or granite, requires minimal processing, primarily extraction and transportation, resulting in a much lower environmental impact.

While concrete offers versatility and affordability, its ecological drawbacks make it less sustainable than natural stone for sculpting. Artists and builders seeking eco-friendly options may prefer natural stone, despite its higher upfront cost, to reduce their carbon footprint. Sustainable art practices increasingly favor materials with lower environmental impacts, making this comparison crucial for environmentally conscious creators.