Are there differences in the lifecycle assessment (LCA) of WPC vs. aluminum Outdoor Loungers?

When evaluating the environmental impact of outdoor furniture, lifecycle assessment (LCA) provides critical insights. WPC (Wood Plastic Composite) and aluminum loungers differ significantly in their LCA profiles. WPC combines recycled wood fibers and plastics, offering biodegradability and lower carbon emissions during production. However, its durability may be shorter than aluminum, potentially increasing replacement frequency. Aluminum loungers, while energy-intensive to produce, boast exceptional longevity and recyclability, reducing long-term waste. Key LCA factors include material sourcing, manufacturing energy use, lifespan, and end-of-life disposal. For eco-conscious consumers, WPC may appeal for its renewable materials, while aluminum excels in recyclability and durability. The choice depends on prioritizing immediate sustainability (WPC) or long-term resource efficiency (aluminum).