What are the ethical debates around using non-biodegradable composites in public art?

The use of non-biodegradable composites in public art has sparked significant ethical debates, particularly concerning environmental sustainability and long-term ecological impact. While these materials offer durability and creative flexibility, critics argue that their persistence in landfills and ecosystems contradicts the growing global emphasis on sustainability. Proponents highlight their cost-effectiveness and structural benefits, but environmentalists advocate for biodegradable or recycled alternatives to align art with ecological responsibility. The discussion also touches on the artist's role in promoting environmental consciousness versus prioritizing aesthetic and functional goals. As public art often symbolizes communal values, the choice of materials reflects broader societal priorities, making this debate a microcosm of the tension between innovation and environmental ethics.